Article, date: 5th, Sept. 2025
Introduction.
South Sudan is currently engaged in a border conflict, especially with Uganda. The two countries are trading accusations of encroachments into each other’s territory, putting lives at stake. This opinionated article is a wake-up call that there is an urgent need to find a lasting solution to the border conflict. It is notably important to understand the demarcation and the type of boundaries, which I will share based on my research.
Natural Boundary. This type of boundary is demarcated or formed by natural or physical features such as rivers, mountains, or deserts. This is common with African countries.
Artificial. Artificial boundaries are defined by treaties or agreements based on latitude or longitude, often referencing colonial maps, as in the case of South Sudan and Uganda.
Geometric: The borderline between Egypt and Sudan is a prime example of a geometric boundary. This type of boundary is a straight line that often disregards natural or physical features.
Cultural. Cultural boundaries are purely traditional. It is based on the linguistic, cultural, and religious aspects of the people.
Why, Boundaries?
1. Political stability. A country with a stable political landscape is sovereign, providing a basis for stable political governance. South Sudan's border conflicts are a significant contributor to its instability, affecting its relationships with Uganda, Kenya, Sudan, and Ethiopia.
2. Economic benefits. Stable borders promote economic control. This is achieved through implementing tariffs, managing resources, and regulating trade. Due to its border issues, South Sudan misses out on these benefits.
3. Security and defence. The South Sudanese people have suffered greatly due to territorial encroachments, with many losing their lives to their neighbours' actions. Without concrete knowledge of its boundaries, South Sudan struggles to defend its citizens effectively. A better-defined boundary would enhance the national army's ability to provide standard defence and security.
4. Cultural identity. Clear boundaries help preserve cultural identities and heritages. Without them, a country's rich cultural heritage can be lost due to cross-cultural influences.
Action Points
Short-term benefits.
1. Border demarcation. Both countries should work collectively on the demarcation mechanism, including local residents, to establish a clear border.
2. Diplomatic efforts. South Sudan and Uganda should prioritize diplomacy over politicking to solidify their agreement. The longer they delay, the higher the risk of further conflict.
3. Clear channel of communications. Territorial forces should be trained and deployed with full knowledge of their territorial responsibilities. This requires mechanized geometric equipment to support their efforts when needed.
Long-term implications
4. Political Stability: Resolving border conflicts will contribute to a stable political landscape, enabling effective governance and sovereignty.
5. Security and Defence: A well-defined border will enhance South Sudan's defence and security, protecting its citizens from territorial encroachments.
6. Cultural Preservation: Clear boundaries will help preserve South Sudan's cultural identities and heritages by reducing cross-cultural influences.
7. Economic Cooperation: Stable borders will promote economic control, allowing South Sudan to implement tariffs, regulate trade, and manage its resources effectively.
Conclusion
The border conflict between South Sudan and Uganda highlights the importance of the need for well-defined boundaries for a country's stability, security, economy, and cultural identity. By prioritizing diplomatic efforts, border demarcation, and clear communication channels, both countries can work towards a peaceful resolution and realise the benefits of stable borders. Ultimately, a well-managed border will enable South Sudan to assert its sovereignty, protect its citizens, preserve its cultural heritage, and promote economic development.
Abunerry, Ayella John Bosco
Writer, Critic, and Teacher.
