Skip to main content

THE CLERICAL COLLAR: A Divine Authority or a Distinctive Measure?

By Pastor Abunerry, Ayella.

2-2-2026

Torit

When a cleric wears a collar, they may feel divinely immeasurable. They usurp authority as if they are next to Jesus in line. As a result, they tend to overlook their colleagues who do not wear collars. Yet the very colleagues they overlook often outperform them in many areas. Although some of these clerics adorn themselves with cassocks and collars, or gowns, they do not know what transpired or when the collar was invented. This article briefly recounts the origin of the collar and its purpose, which is not biblical but rather a distinctive attire meant to distinguish clerics from laypeople.

In 1867, Rev. McLeod, a Presbyterian minister in Scotland, invented the first clerical collar. He combined a detachable collar with a white band of cloth to create the distinctive collar worn by clerics today. Before that, Reformed pastors wore a scarf called a cravat, which was the precursor to the modern collar. The purpose of the collar was simply that the clergy wanted to be “easily recognised” in public.

It is this public recognition that continues to fracture the church. While it is a good gesture to distinguish pastors or shepherds from the sheep, the use of the collar has been abused by many clerics. It has become a symbol used to exploit and manipulate worship and leadership. Additionally, some pastors use their collars to threaten believers who might not agree with them on daily issues. Such an unbiblical act compromises the health and life of the church of Christ.

When Jesus chose His apostles, commissioned them to go into the whole world, taught the people, baptised them, and commanded them to obey all His teachings, He did not equip them to usurp authority over their colleagues. Jesus did not give collars to the disciples as a sign of spiritual authority. Just because one wears a collar, he should not undermine those who do not, so long as they serve God faithfully.

A collar is good when it is worn only as a distinctive measure rather than as a symbol of spiritual or governing authority over the church. The church needs shepherds, not collars. Even Jesus instructed Peter to feed the flock, not to wear a collar and feed the flock (John 21:15–19). A collar is just like an ID; an ID is mostly valuable in an insecure environment. What matters most is what a pastor delivers to the church. With or without collars, no one should undermine others who faithfully serve God. Therefore, we should always allow the Bible to guide our instincts rather than depend on outward appearance to usurp authority over the church.

End.

Brutal Writer, Ecclesiastical Critic, Freelance Teacher and Invincible Activist

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MAGWI COUNTY UNDER CATTLE ATTACKS AGAIN.

    File Image July 11, 2025. To the Commissioner,  Magwi County Magwi County Maize Crops under Cattle Attack Again I am writing to inform you that Magwi County is once again facing an attack by cattle driven by the Dinka Balalo of Uganda. This is a direct result of an evacuation in response to the President's executive order aimed at stopping cattle-related conflicts in the Acholi region of Northern Uganda. As you may recall, the last conflict in Magwi County, which occurred in February, claimed lives and was not an isolated incident. Similar conflicts have recurred since 2014, when the Dinka Balalo from Bor forcefully entered Magwi County and the Equatoria region. Hon, you and the Magwi County community need to be aware of the potential resettlement of cattle in our lands. Our county's livelihood depends on its fertile soil, whereas the Dinka Balalo's survival relies on milk production. I urge you and your security team to remain vigilant and prevent any cattle ...

IN HIS FOOTSTEPS: The Characters of A Leader's Heart

Meta AI "This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop, he desires a good work." 1 Timothy 3:1-7 Devotion 10. July 10, 2025 God's Design for Leadership   God alone is omniscient and sovereign. He designed leadership with specific character traits, appointing humanity to steward the world on His behalf. As we progress through Scripture, we observe God's design for leadership and the character traits required of each individual.   For example, He denied Saul leadership despite the pressure from the people. He chose David from among Jesse's children because David met His criteria, possessing the character and qualities worthy of leadership. In leadership, there are specific characteristics that leaders must embody to lead God's people. Paul listed these qualities in his letter to Timothy, emphasizing integrity, humility, and servanthood as essential for leading the church of God.   The Contrast Between God's Design and the Worl...

ESTABLISH A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT DINKA KINGDOM WITHIN THEIR TERRITORIES.” Advocate Kenyi Advises President Kiir

Advocate & human rights lawyer Kenyi YA Kenyi said that Salva Kiir has long abandoned the national interest of South Sudan and instead chosen to pursue a narrow and divisive tribal agenda. From the time he was appointed deputy—based on tribal considerations—during the liberation struggle to all his subsequent roles within the regime, Kiir has consistently implemented policies that prioritize the interests of one ethnic group: the Jieng (Dinka), at the direct expense of the other 63 tribes of South Sudan.   Through his actions and appointments, he has systematically planted the seeds of division, ethnic discord, and mistrust among our people. Under his leadership, South Sudan—a sovereign nation built by the collective sacrifice of 64 tribes—has been reduced to what increasingly appears to be an absolute Jieng Kingdom, with Salva Kiir acting as its self-declared King.   If Kiir remains committed to advancing his tribal project, then we are left with no option but to gran...