Skip to main content

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.

INCLUSIVITY OF THE TOPOSA PEOPLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 11 KM ROAD

23rd July 2025 

As I write this opinion letter, I feel compelled to share my concerns about the Nadapal annexation, a long-standing cross-border issue. On 1 October 2021, a communiqué was issued following a meeting between Gov. Louis Lobong of Eastern Equatoria State (EES) and the Turkana County government of Kenya regarding the upgrade of an 11-kilometre section of road in Nadapal along the A1 river road, which lies 11 kilometres inside South Sudan. However, the agreement was signed solely by Gov. Louis Lobong, although six signatories from Turkana County were present. 

Although the intention to develop the road is positive, the agreement did not meet the standard requirements for bilateral understanding. As a result, the Toposa community resisted, leading to the loss of lives and halting of the project. The details of what transpired between then and now remain unclear. 

Recently, another communication has been issued, dated July 16, 2025, involving the National Minister of Roads, Dr. Lam Akol, and the Kenyan government, insisting on resuming the road upgrades. While this is a positive development, questions arise about whether the local population was consulted and why the state Ministry of Roads and Transport was not included in the agreement. 

It is essential to consider the following reasons:

  1. - Inclusivity: Developments are beneficial when the local population is included and feels a sense of ownership. The Toposa community should be involved in the project through their parliamentarians or local leaders to ensure their support and understanding.
  2. - Sensitisation and benefits: A clear impact assessment and benefit allocation plan should be established to ensure the local population benefits from the project. Transparency and accountability are crucial to avoid the project being seen as an annexation of Toposalands.
  3. - State protocols: The governor cannot sign an international business deal alone if his counterparts have included several signatories. The Minister of Roads and Transport should play a key role in mediating the agreement, and disobedience of state protocol can be seen as business tyranny.
  4. Cultural preservation: The project should ensure that the cultural heritage and traditions of the Toposa community are preserved and respected. Any development should be done in a way that does not compromise the community's way of life.
  5. - Environmental impact: The project should undergo a thorough environmental impact assessment to ensure that it does not harm the environment or the community's livelihood. Measures should be put in place to mitigate any potential negative impacts.
  6. - Economic benefits: The project should provide economic benefits to the local population, such as job opportunities and access to markets. This will help to improve the livelihoods of the community and ensure that they benefit from the project.
  7. - Security concerns: The project should ensure that the security concerns of the local population are addressed. Measures should be put in place to prevent any potential security threats and to protect the community's interests.

By considering these factors, the road upgrade project can be a positive development that benefits both the local population and the country as a whole. The government must prioritise inclusivity, transparency, and accountability in the project's implementation. 

In conclusion, while the intention to develop the road is commendable, it's essential to ensure that the project is implemented in a manner that respects the rights and interests of the local population. The government should prioritise consultation, transparency, and accountability to avoid any further conflicts and ensure the project's success. 

Sincerely,

Ayella John Bosco

EES

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Letter to the Governor of Eastern Equatoria State

02-08-2026 His Excellency Louis Lobong Lojore Governor, Eastern Equatoria State Subject: Urgent Appeal for the Immediate Removal of Cattle from Magwi County, Particularly the Nimule Area Your Excellency, I write to you as a concerned citizen regarding the continued presence of thousands of cattle in Magwi County, particularly in and around the Nimule area. This situation demands your urgent attention and intervention. In the recent past, government authorities, local leaders, and communities agreed that the presence of cattle in Magwi County is unacceptable. This position is consistent with the Presidential directive ordering all cattle to return to their areas of origin. Despite this clear directive, many cattle keepers, particularly from Bor, continue to disregard the order and have returned with large herds into the county. Today, thousands of cattle are moving freely in the Nimule area and occupying locations less than ten kilometres from Nimule Municipality. We are all aware of t...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNMASKING THE RED BELT: Community Defense or Security Threats

WHY IS EQUATORIA MENTIONED? September 2, 2025 Many South Sudanese tribes have vigilante groups, particularly in cattle-keeping communities. Based on their mandates, it is clear that each group aims to protect and defend its community from neighbouring raiders. Communities like the Dinka, Nuer, and Murle have such groups, and their long-standing conflicts over resources suggest this is a survival mechanism. From my experience, South Sudan's community insecurity worsened in 2017 when the economy collapsed due to unresolved civil conflicts. Youths formed groups with different names, such as the Toronto, West Coasts, Black Mambas, and Invincible Scorpions, in Juba and other major cities. In Nimule, many of these youths brought ideas from Juba's Sherikat suburb after escaping arrest or internal disputes. Today, gangs are widespread in major towns and cities.   Recently, the Red Belt group emerged in Bor, disrupting a peaceful tournament and attacking the National Security Servic...
Post a Comment
Read more

DO NOT JOIN STAR INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY MAGWI CAMPUS UNTIL IT FULLY ESTABLISHES ITS OWN STUDY CENTRE

Between 2017 and 2019, I wrote several articles about the fraudulent practices of Kampala University. Those who were its students were aggressively defensive, only to concede later. This happened after the Ministry of Higher Education declared the university illegal. Although the students pursued a legal case against the university, they sadly lost. Education is a right for everyone, but a learning institution should provide quality and legitimate services to the public. In South Sudan, several universities and colleges are operating illegally and exploiting poor students. On 22 June 2026, Star International University (SIU) launched one of its campuses in Magwi Payam, making it the second campus after the Nimule campus, which was established around 2021–2022. Accordingly, this could be the third campus in Eastern Equatoria, including the Torit campus. Such rapid expansion raises serious questions about the credibility of the university. A credible learning institution cannot spread i...
2 comments
Read more