Skip to main content

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.

INCLUSIVITY OF THE TOPOSA PEOPLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 11 KM ROAD

23rd July 2025 

As I write this opinion letter, I feel compelled to share my concerns about the Nadapal annexation, a long-standing cross-border issue. On 1 October 2021, a communiqué was issued following a meeting between Gov. Louis Lobong of Eastern Equatoria State (EES) and the Turkana County government of Kenya regarding the upgrade of an 11-kilometre section of road in Nadapal along the A1 river road, which lies 11 kilometres inside South Sudan. However, the agreement was signed solely by Gov. Louis Lobong, although six signatories from Turkana County were present. 

Although the intention to develop the road is positive, the agreement did not meet the standard requirements for bilateral understanding. As a result, the Toposa community resisted, leading to the loss of lives and halting of the project. The details of what transpired between then and now remain unclear. 

Recently, another communication has been issued, dated July 16, 2025, involving the National Minister of Roads, Dr. Lam Akol, and the Kenyan government, insisting on resuming the road upgrades. While this is a positive development, questions arise about whether the local population was consulted and why the state Ministry of Roads and Transport was not included in the agreement. 

It is essential to consider the following reasons:

  1. - Inclusivity: Developments are beneficial when the local population is included and feels a sense of ownership. The Toposa community should be involved in the project through their parliamentarians or local leaders to ensure their support and understanding.
  2. - Sensitisation and benefits: A clear impact assessment and benefit allocation plan should be established to ensure the local population benefits from the project. Transparency and accountability are crucial to avoid the project being seen as an annexation of Toposalands.
  3. - State protocols: The governor cannot sign an international business deal alone if his counterparts have included several signatories. The Minister of Roads and Transport should play a key role in mediating the agreement, and disobedience of state protocol can be seen as business tyranny.
  4. Cultural preservation: The project should ensure that the cultural heritage and traditions of the Toposa community are preserved and respected. Any development should be done in a way that does not compromise the community's way of life.
  5. - Environmental impact: The project should undergo a thorough environmental impact assessment to ensure that it does not harm the environment or the community's livelihood. Measures should be put in place to mitigate any potential negative impacts.
  6. - Economic benefits: The project should provide economic benefits to the local population, such as job opportunities and access to markets. This will help to improve the livelihoods of the community and ensure that they benefit from the project.
  7. - Security concerns: The project should ensure that the security concerns of the local population are addressed. Measures should be put in place to prevent any potential security threats and to protect the community's interests.

By considering these factors, the road upgrade project can be a positive development that benefits both the local population and the country as a whole. The government must prioritise inclusivity, transparency, and accountability in the project's implementation. 

In conclusion, while the intention to develop the road is commendable, it's essential to ensure that the project is implemented in a manner that respects the rights and interests of the local population. The government should prioritise consultation, transparency, and accountability to avoid any further conflicts and ensure the project's success. 

Sincerely,

Ayella John Bosco

EES

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MAGWI COUNTY UNDER CATTLE ATTACKS AGAIN.

    File Image July 11, 2025. To the Commissioner,  Magwi County Magwi County Maize Crops under Cattle Attack Again I am writing to inform you that Magwi County is once again facing an attack by cattle driven by the Dinka Balalo of Uganda. This is a direct result of an evacuation in response to the President's executive order aimed at stopping cattle-related conflicts in the Acholi region of Northern Uganda. As you may recall, the last conflict in Magwi County, which occurred in February, claimed lives and was not an isolated incident. Similar conflicts have recurred since 2014, when the Dinka Balalo from Bor forcefully entered Magwi County and the Equatoria region. Hon, you and the Magwi County community need to be aware of the potential resettlement of cattle in our lands. Our county's livelihood depends on its fertile soil, whereas the Dinka Balalo's survival relies on milk production. I urge you and your security team to remain vigilant and prevent any cattle ...

IN HIS FOOTSTEPS: The Characters of A Leader's Heart

Meta AI "This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop, he desires a good work." 1 Timothy 3:1-7 Devotion 10. July 10, 2025 God's Design for Leadership   God alone is omniscient and sovereign. He designed leadership with specific character traits, appointing humanity to steward the world on His behalf. As we progress through Scripture, we observe God's design for leadership and the character traits required of each individual.   For example, He denied Saul leadership despite the pressure from the people. He chose David from among Jesse's children because David met His criteria, possessing the character and qualities worthy of leadership. In leadership, there are specific characteristics that leaders must embody to lead God's people. Paul listed these qualities in his letter to Timothy, emphasizing integrity, humility, and servanthood as essential for leading the church of God.   The Contrast Between God's Design and the Worl...

ESTABLISH A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT DINKA KINGDOM WITHIN THEIR TERRITORIES.” Advocate Kenyi Advises President Kiir

Advocate & human rights lawyer Kenyi YA Kenyi said that Salva Kiir has long abandoned the national interest of South Sudan and instead chosen to pursue a narrow and divisive tribal agenda. From the time he was appointed deputy—based on tribal considerations—during the liberation struggle to all his subsequent roles within the regime, Kiir has consistently implemented policies that prioritize the interests of one ethnic group: the Jieng (Dinka), at the direct expense of the other 63 tribes of South Sudan.   Through his actions and appointments, he has systematically planted the seeds of division, ethnic discord, and mistrust among our people. Under his leadership, South Sudan—a sovereign nation built by the collective sacrifice of 64 tribes—has been reduced to what increasingly appears to be an absolute Jieng Kingdom, with Salva Kiir acting as its self-declared King.   If Kiir remains committed to advancing his tribal project, then we are left with no option but to gran...