A Rebuttal to Brother Francis Irra’s Facebook Post
13-1-2026
Early this morning, I came across a post on my Brother Francis Irra’s timeline, which read:
“Why
are the commissioners of Magwi County always appointed from the Acholi people?
Does the county now belong to one tribe?”
Brother
Irra has raised a genuine concern that deserves a sober and honest response.
Unfortunately, most of the comments under his post were emotionally driven,
shallow, and unhelpful. If such sentiments are left unchecked, they risk
igniting unnecessary tension between the two beautiful communities of Magwi
County, the Acholi and the Madi.
This
response is therefore offered as a clarification
and as a call for restraint,
unity, and responsible dialogue. Whatever grievances exist must never be
expressed in a manner that divides our people. After careful consideration, I
find that the appointment of Acholi commissioners in Magwi County does not qualify as tribalism. Several
key factors support this position: the appointing authority, power-sharing
arrangements, political interests, party dynamics, and security considerations.
The Appointing Authority.
For
an action to qualify as tribalism, power must be exercised by members of the
same tribe in favour of their own. In this case, the appointing authority, the
Governor, is not Acholi.
Governor Lobong, who is a Toposa (In fact, he is an in-law of the Madi),
appoints commissioners based on political and administrative considerations,
not ethnic identity. Therefore, labelling these appointments as tribalism is
inaccurate.
Power Distribution under R-ARCSS.
Under
the Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan
(R-ARCSS), political parties agreed on power sharing. Magwi County was
allocated two key positions: The
County Commissioner and A ministerial position at the state
level. These positions were to be shared between the two main communities. The Madi community took the ministerial slot,
while the Acholi took the
commissionership, consistent with previous SPLM power-sharing
arrangements post the defunct 32-state era. This partnership is a political
agreement, not a tribal conspiracy as some might see.
Expression of Interest.
At
present, the commissioner’s position is not
elective. One must express interest and meet the required criteria to be
considered. To my knowledge, no Madi
individual has formally shown interest in the commissionership role
under the current arrangement. The governor appoints from among those who come
forward and qualify. This alone dismisses claims of deliberate exclusion.
Party Politics.
Magwi
County is currently governed by the SPLM,
in line with the 2018 peace agreement. It is well known that the Madi community
has historically had strained relations with the SPLM due to past atrocities
committed against them. As a result, few
Madis actively and fully engage in SPLM party politics. Political
parties naturally appoint individuals they trust to uphold party interests.
This reality is political, not tribal.
Security Background.
The
commissioner’s office is not merely administrative; it is deeply tied to county security and stability. While
the constitution allows for civilian leadership, the current security situation
demands strong security awareness and experience. It is difficult to identify
many Madi generals within the SSPDF who are both willing and closely connected
to the grassroots of Magwi County. Apart from Hon. Emilio Igga, few names stand
out. This reality has influenced appointment decisions, whether we like it or
not.
Conclusion:
With
all these factors considered, I re-ask the question: Is Magwi County tribalised? My answer is a categorical no. This position is not taken to defend any tribe but
to protect unity, truth, and peace
in our County. Power sharing, party politics, expressed interest, and security
realities, not tribalism, explain the current leadership reshuffle.
To
those calling for an independent Madi County, I say this respectfully: this is not the time. The Acholi and
Madi share a bond that history, geography, and survival have woven together.
Anyone who believes either community can thrive alone in this critical moment
is deceiving themselves and promoting failed tribal thinking.
I
call upon all people of Magwi County to support whoever is appointed to lead, unless there are legitimate concerns about
integrity or competence. Let us reject sentiments that divide us and
instead build a future anchored in unity, justice, and mutual respect.
Abunerry, Ayella
Mavker, Kotev and Rabii
Good response brother, only few do understand the significance of unity and the truth about Magwi County since liberation period. Leadership should never be based on tribal line, Magwi County is for both Ma'di and Acholi communities and those living within the county at the mercy of the two sons of the same father Magwi.
ReplyDeleteWith the level of formal education among the communities of Magwi County talking or basing arguments on tribalism sounds a mischief. Unity in neighborliness is key to development.
Thanks