Skip to main content

EVALUATION OF THE ONLINE POLL FOR EASTERN EQUATORIA STATE GOVERNORSHIP 2026–2031


Poll Organized by Sir. Abunerry Blogcast 

Let us assume, for the purpose of this analysis, that the
154 participants in the online poll represent the entire electorate and that all 154 are eligible voters.

Under this assumption, the poll can be treated as a 154-voter hypothetical election simulation.

POLL RESULTS

    1. Hon. Nartision Loluke – 75 votes – 48.7%
    2. Hon. Ayella John – 30 votes – 19.5%
    3. Hon. Lobong Lojore – 23 votes – 14.9%
    4. Hon. Tobiolo Oromo – 12 votes – 7.8%
    5. Undecided – 14 votes – 9.1%

Total voters: 154

Duration of voting: 24 hours

PURPOSE OF THE ONLINE POLL

The poll was conducted for two main purposes:

  • To identify who the 154 participating voters would choose to lead Eastern Equatoria State for the next five years if an election were held.
  • To evaluate Governor Lobong Lojore's level of support among the participating voters.

ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS

1. Hon. Nartision Loluke

With 75 out of 154 votes, Hon. Nartision Loluke received the largest share of the votes, accounting for approximately 48.7% of the hypothetical electorate.

Under the assumptions of this poll, he therefore emerges with the highest level of support among the candidates presented.

2. Hon. Ayella John

Hon. Ayella John received 30 votes, representing approximately 19.5% of the hypothetical electorate.

Under this poll's assumptions, Ayella is 7 votes ahead of Governor Lobong Lojore, who received 23 votes.

This indicates that, within this 154-voter exercise, Ayella attracted more support than the incumbent governor among the participating electorate.

3. Governor Lobong Lojore

Governor Lobong received 23 votes, representing approximately 14.9% of the hypothetical electorate.

Under this particular poll, he placed behind both Hon. Nartision Loluke and Hon. Ayella John.

This result raises questions about the level of support the governor would command among voters represented by this exercise.

4. Hon. Tobiolo Oromo

Hon. Tobiolo Oromo received 12 votes, representing approximately 7.8% of the hypothetical electorate.

Under this poll, he received fewer votes than Hon. Ayella John and Governor Lobong.

5. Undecided voters

The 14 undecided voters, representing approximately 9.1%, are significant because their eventual choices could alter the distribution of support if they were required to vote for one of the candidates.

Earliest results 

WHAT THE NUMBERS TELL US

If these 154 voters were treated as the entire electorate and the election were conducted under the same conditions as this poll, no candidate would have received an absolute majority of the votes.

Hon. Nartision Loluke received 75 votes, leaving him 2 votes short of 77, which would constitute more than half of the 154-voter electorate.

Therefore, under this hypothetical scenario, the poll demonstrates a clear lead for Nartision but not an outright majority.

The result also shows a substantial difference between the leading candidate and the others:

  • Nartision Loluke: 75
  • Ayella John: 30
  • Lobong Lojore: 23
  • Tobiolo Oromo: 12
  • Undecided: 14

The difference between Nartision and Ayella is 45 votes.

The difference between Ayella and Lobong is 7 votes.

The difference between Lobong and Tobiolo is 11 votes.

CONCLUSION

If we accept the 154 participants as the entire hypothetical electorate, the votes have produced a clear ordering of support.

Hon. Nartision Loluke leads with 75 votes, followed by Hon. Ayella John with 30, Governor Lobong Lojore with 23, and Hon. Tobiolo Oromo with 12. Fourteen voters remain undecided.

The most notable result is that, within this hypothetical electorate, Ayella John received more votes than the incumbent Governor Lobong Lojore.

The poll therefore provides an interesting snapshot of how these 154 assumed voters would distribute their support if they were the electorate.

However, the actual election will involve the legally defined electorate and electoral procedures established by the National Elections Commission. The NEC is the institution responsible for conducting elections in South Sudan, including gubernatorial elections.

A MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE OF EASTERN EQUATORIA

Leadership is ultimately a choice made by citizens through the ballot.

The people of Eastern Equatoria should therefore examine the records, programmes, character, experience, vision and promises of every candidate before making their decision.

Ask your representatives about the promises they made. Ask what has been achieved. Ask what remains unfinished. Ask what they intend to do differently.

Whatever choice you make will have consequences for the future of Eastern Equatoria.

Be informed. Be courageous. Be wise.


Sir. Abunerry Blogcast

Brutal Writer, Critic, and Teacher.

Originally written, but AI refined. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open Letter to the Governor of Eastern Equatoria State

02-08-2026 His Excellency Louis Lobong Lojore Governor, Eastern Equatoria State Subject: Urgent Appeal for the Immediate Removal of Cattle from Magwi County, Particularly the Nimule Area Your Excellency, I write to you as a concerned citizen regarding the continued presence of thousands of cattle in Magwi County, particularly in and around the Nimule area. This situation demands your urgent attention and intervention. In the recent past, government authorities, local leaders, and communities agreed that the presence of cattle in Magwi County is unacceptable. This position is consistent with the Presidential directive ordering all cattle to return to their areas of origin. Despite this clear directive, many cattle keepers, particularly from Bor, continue to disregard the order and have returned with large herds into the county. Today, thousands of cattle are moving freely in the Nimule area and occupying locations less than ten kilometres from Nimule Municipality. We are all aware of t...

UNMASKING THE RED BELT: Community Defense or Security Threats

WHY IS EQUATORIA MENTIONED? September 2, 2025 Many South Sudanese tribes have vigilante groups, particularly in cattle-keeping communities. Based on their mandates, it is clear that each group aims to protect and defend its community from neighbouring raiders. Communities like the Dinka, Nuer, and Murle have such groups, and their long-standing conflicts over resources suggest this is a survival mechanism. From my experience, South Sudan's community insecurity worsened in 2017 when the economy collapsed due to unresolved civil conflicts. Youths formed groups with different names, such as the Toronto, West Coasts, Black Mambas, and Invincible Scorpions, in Juba and other major cities. In Nimule, many of these youths brought ideas from Juba's Sherikat suburb after escaping arrest or internal disputes. Today, gangs are widespread in major towns and cities.   Recently, the Red Belt group emerged in Bor, disrupting a peaceful tournament and attacking the National Security Servic...

DO NOT JOIN STAR INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY MAGWI CAMPUS UNTIL IT FULLY ESTABLISHES ITS OWN STUDY CENTRE

Between 2017 and 2019, I wrote several articles about the fraudulent practices of Kampala University. Those who were its students were aggressively defensive, only to concede later. This happened after the Ministry of Higher Education declared the university illegal. Although the students pursued a legal case against the university, they sadly lost. Education is a right for everyone, but a learning institution should provide quality and legitimate services to the public. In South Sudan, several universities and colleges are operating illegally and exploiting poor students. On 22 June 2026, Star International University (SIU) launched one of its campuses in Magwi Payam, making it the second campus after the Nimule campus, which was established around 2021–2022. Accordingly, this could be the third campus in Eastern Equatoria, including the Torit campus. Such rapid expansion raises serious questions about the credibility of the university. A credible learning institution cannot spread i...